Before I continue with this post, let me present a snapshot of how the 17th parliamentary general elections of Singapore went (forgive the subpar formatting):
Parties and alliances | Leader | Seats won | % of valid vote | % swing from last GE |
People’s Action Party (PAP) | Lee Hsien Loong | 83 | 69.86 | +9.72 |
Workers’ Party (WP) | Low Thia Khiang | 6 | 12.48 | -0.34 |
Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) | Chee Soon Juan | 0 | 3.76 | -1.07 |
National Solidarity Party (NSP) | Sebastian Teo | 0 | 3.53 | -8.51 |
Reform Party (RP) | Kenneth Jeyaretnam | 0 | 2.63 | -1.65 |
Singaporeans First (SingFirst) | Tan Jee Say | 0 | 2.25 | (new party) |
Singapore People’s Party (SPP) | Lina Chiam | 0 | 2.17 | -0.94 |
Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA) | Desmond Lim | 0 | 2.06 | -0.72 |
People’s Power Party (PPP) | Goh Meng Seng | 0 | 1.13 | (new party) |
Independents | N/A | 0 | 0.12 | N/A |
Valid votes | 2,257,016 | 97.95% of total votes cast | ||
Invalid (blank or spoilt) votes | 47,315 | 2.05% of total votes cast | ||
Total votes cast | 2,304,331 | Voter turnout: 93.56% of eligible voters. | ||
Did not vote | 158,595 | Total residents: 3,891,370 | ||
Eligible voters | 2,462,926 | Total population: 5,469,700 |
In 2011, I wrote a short piece about the general elections then and how it was a watershed one for the country, since the opposition were out in force and managed to win six seats. They gained another one in a by-election two years later. Buoyed by my own sense of idealism then, I spoilt my vote in protest against the ruling party, as well as to show my contempt for the opposition party that came to contest in my constituency.
Since then, a great many things have changed, not just within the political landscape, but also in myself. As with every other human being, my experiences during this intervening period have shaped my perspectives along a new path and in so doing, affected my actions as well.
As I have alluded to in my previous postings, I became involved in grassroots and community work. It all began out of curiosity, but I soon found myself getting sucked in deeper and deeper because of two reasons – I seldom say no to requests made of me, and when I commit I tend to want to see things to the end, and also because I’ve met a good bunch of people who were a great pleasure to work with; that made me feel like I was part of a team. In addition, we rallied around a leader who ran a pretty tight ship, the current Minister for Social and Family Development Tan Chuan-Jin. In the past 1.75 years, I have grown to like and respect this man, even if I am not sold completely on the party’s cause.
I had wanted to remain neutral, without ever choosing a party or sides to align myself to, because I wanted to maintain that seed of journalistic impartiality within myself. To simply watch the world go by (or burn), and report on its happenings. But because I began my adventure through MPS (Meet-the-People Sessions), which is actually a political activity, I found it increasingly difficult to do so. It does not help that in Singapore, the lines are blurred between the ruling party, the government, and this particular avenue of community service.
I am not going to talk about the wider implications of GE 2015 in general or analyse the results. Instead, this post is about what I’ve seen and done, opening yet another chapter in my political awakening.
Two posts back, I mentioned that I had agreed to do something related to politics. I agreed out of curiosity, as usual, jumping at the chance for a new experience. What was it? It was to help the PAP with it’s campaigning for Mr Tan.
Not wanting to show my support in public, I decided to work from behind the scenes. Our work was to monitor the online media space for the sentiments of netizens, and to engage in and shape discussion where necessary. Suddenly, all the lessons I learnt in university about astroturfing and such made a lot of sense. Compared to the last GE, this time all parties involved had an even greater presence than before. There were discussions, some much heated, by supporters from both sides of the line.The digital battlefield was every bit as big, if not bigger, than the physical one, and the contested space needed to be filled with messages aligned to our cause so as to push forward the agenda.
In so doing, I put aside my principles of detached neutrality, and got into the thick of things. It was interesting for the most part of it, and I did get carried away while still being myself – it was the seemingly the best of both worlds. I learnt once again that once someone is firmly entrenched in their beliefs, confirmation bias would set in and it would be difficult to convince someone otherwise even in the face of overwhelming evidence. Thus, the middle ground were the targets to be courted and I realised ultimately that one had to choose sides, especially in cases like this where the stakes were high, and the future of the nation was also up in the air. The middle ground, in a certain sense… were the pawns.
I believed, of course, that the other side were using similar tactics in an attempt to start conversations or level allegations against our side. I think I did see some signs of it online, but this is something I will never be able to confirm. What I found interesting was that a new way of commentary was taking traction this time. Instead of penning one’s thoughts per a normal Facebook comment, for example, people were posting pictures to make their point, be it a funny one (e.g. PM Lee and ESM Goh praying to the now-deceased Lee Kuan Yew), or ones with the relevant symbology that could be allow others to instantly identify his or her political leanings (e.g. a picture of Marvel Comics’ Thor, who wields a hammer -> implied to be WP supporter, since their logo is that of a hammer).
At the very last moment, I also volunteered to be a Polling Agent for Mr Tan because the Branch still needed people. Our role was to observe the electoral proceedings to make sure there were no foul play. At my station, though, I was left alone since my opposite numbers and my colleagues chose to sit together amongst themselves. Without anything to cross-check with, all I could do was stare and let my thoughts run free. I was incredibly restless an hour into the shift, yet I had to remain professional for the most of it. Mr Tan did drop by for a visit somewhere in the middle, though there wasn’t really anyone around at that time so he came and gone. At this point, I would like to acknowledge the civil servants and volunteers who were activated as Presiding Officers/Assistant Returning Officers to facilitate the entire process of this exercise in citizenship. Good job and rest well today, guys.
This experience was definitely an interesting one and an eye-opener for me. Like the movie villains who fall into the dark side after their initial taste of things (usually out of curiosity, too), I think I have subconscious floated closer and closer in terms of support for the PAP. While I am cognizant of the fact that much more needs to be done on their end in terms of communication, policy work and whatnot, I have seen the good work done for the people in the area where I serve.
Although Mr Tan does not represent me directly as an MP, I am glad that our efforts have paid off and that he can remain in service to the people for another term. This time round, the choice was clear for me.